Architectural Recalibration #7: Superstructures


If there’s one thing that has become apparent in recent weeks, it’s how quickly our set values and ideas can become outdated. This also applies to architectural concepts. ARCAM has begun to take stock of this for further consideration.

Filmstill from Superstudio – Supersurface: An alternative model for life on the Earth

13 May 2020 – There’s been a lot of outrage this week. Entrepreneurs are angry with the government while they await a new emergency economic package. Boomers are angry with millennials, and vice versa, and neither group is shying away from terms like ‘relational apartheid’. The whole of the Netherlands is angry with the Forum for Democracy, wrecker of cultural policy in North Brabant. In Amsterdam, there’s consternation about a terrace plan for restaurants and cafés, which is already standard practice in Vilnius. Architectural recalibration #7: Superstructures.

A superstructure is an overarching grid or system, physical or otherwise, on an existing base. Strips of duct tape placed one and a half metres apart are a superstructure. In architecture, it’s that part of the building which is built atop a foundation. The plan for a large terrace on the Nieuwmarkt is seen by opponents as a superstructure covering public space in the city centre.

In the 1960s of the Boomers, too, consumerism in society was viewed critically. While Archigram sought an antidote to commerce in the technological spectacle of their nomadic movement and the Metabolists entrenched themselves in capsular isolation, Superstudio (Adolfo Natalini and Cristiano Ronaldo di Francia, 1966) designed a grid-like structure that would set humanity free. In doing so, they sought a response to the ‘commercial instincts of the bourgeoisie, which had directly appropriated their [the architects of Modernist Building] theories and subverted them to their own purpose, which was making money.’

Even with the best of intentions, a grid is directive and prone to exclusion. Architecturally, a maximally efficient matrix of tables and chairs can be considered a dystopian manifestation of the restricted person as a mere plaything of commerce and globalization. Superstudio designed a Superstructure for a new, free world that aimed not for the functional exploitation of space, but rather the liberation thereof. Its ordering would be somewhat compelling, admittedly, but it would make streets and squares – and certainly terraces – superfluous. Each node on this grid of lines would become a (temporary) epicentre, where the nomadic human could engage in spiritual development, free from entertainment’s predictable conditioning.

Around the same time, Constant Nieuwenhuys also explored the liberation of ‘the playful man’. New Babylon (1956–1974), aptly described by Mark Wigley as ‘the architecture of hospitality’, however, was not without nasty dilemmas in which every designed freedom meant a restriction or even forcible exclusion of the other.

There are smaller-scale alternatives. On 12 May in Het Parool, Jeroen Beekmans (Pop-Up City), pointed out the countless places outside the city centre – not to be confused with Zef Hemel’s vision of tourism – where terraces, freedom, and leisurely pursuits go quite well together. Mediamatic went viral (no pun intended) this week with its exclusive capsules along the quay. The dividing line between freedom and restriction, commerce and creativity, is exceedingly thin.

ARCAM-director Indira van ‘t Klooster


Associated

(NL) Architectonisch herijken #14 – Verveling

(NL) Nu we in een gedeeltelijke lockdown gaan, kunnen architecten tot voorbeeld dienen. Die kunnen zich namelijk niet vervelen.

(NL) Architectonisch herijken #13 – Jaarboek Architectuur

(NL) Deze tijd vraagt om gevoeligheid en inlevingsvermogen. En de reflecties van de redactie van het Jaarboek Architectuur blijken dit jaar ongekend...

Architectural Recalibration #12: Free Space

The disruptive power of the virus is slowly becoming apparent worldwide.

Architectural Recalibration #11: Donut City

What does Donut City Amsterdam look like?

Architectural Recalibration #10: Housing Floor Plans

A critical review of the Timeline revealed that an incredible number of improvements have been made in Amsterdam between...

Architectural Recalibration #9: Dear White Architects

How woke are architects?

Architectural Recalibration #8: The Ornament

The need for a break out after the (first) outbreak rises and the urge for storytelling grows.

Architectural Recalibration #6: The architect in a lab coat

Architects enjoy positioning themselves as healers. Architectural recalibration #6: the architect in a doctor's jacket.

Architectural recalibration #5 – Proportions

Rooms, spaces, models, maps, satellite images, and photographs – size, scale, and proportions are an indispensable element for designers in...

Architectural recalibration #4 – Sensory design

Architectural Recalibration #4 delves into the art of sensory design.

Architectural recalibration #3 – Routing versus Dérive

Part three in the series Architectural recalibration examines the new concept of the 6ft society. 

Architectural recalibration #2 – Public domain

Examining the notion of Public Space in the Architectural recalibration series.

Architectural recalibration #1 – Home

In the coming weeks – working from home – ARCAM will be exploring the new world.